kenyatta:

The Velvet Underground sues the Andy Warhol Foundation for infringing use of the “public domain” banana design that Andy Warhol made for them in 1967.
via abelson:

The Velvet Underground sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, accusing it of infringing the trademark for the banana design on the cover of the rock group’s first album in 1967.
The band’s founders, Lou Reed and John Cale, said that the foundation infringed the design by licensing it to third parties, according to the complaint filed today in federal court in Manhattan.
The band, which was active from about 1965 to 1972, formed an artistic collaboration with Warhol, who designed the banana illustration for “The Velvet Underground and Nico,” which critics have labeled one of the most influential rock recordings of all time, according to the complaint.
The Warhol Foundation claimed it has a copyright interest in the design, according to the lawsuit. The Velvet Underground partnership said in the complaint that the design can’t be copyrighted because it’s in the public domain. The banana image Warhol furnished for the illustration came from an advertisement that was in the public domain, according to the complaint.
The illustration appeared on the album cover without a copyright notice and no one sought to copyright it, according to the complaint. That put the design in the public domain, the group said in the lawsuit.
“The banana design is a significant element of Velvet Underground’s ongoing licensed merchandising activity,” the group said. Use of the design as a trademark by the band “has been exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted for more than 25 years.”

kenyatta:

The Velvet Underground sues the Andy Warhol Foundation for infringing use of the “public domain” banana design that Andy Warhol made for them in 1967.

via abelson:

The Velvet Underground sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, accusing it of infringing the trademark for the banana design on the cover of the rock group’s first album in 1967.

The band’s founders, Lou Reed and John Cale, said that the foundation infringed the design by licensing it to third parties, according to the complaint filed today in federal court in Manhattan.

The band, which was active from about 1965 to 1972, formed an artistic collaboration with Warhol, who designed the banana illustration for “The Velvet Underground and Nico,” which critics have labeled one of the most influential rock recordings of all time, according to the complaint.

The Warhol Foundation claimed it has a copyright interest in the design, according to the lawsuit. The Velvet Underground partnership said in the complaint that the design can’t be copyrighted because it’s in the public domain. The banana image Warhol furnished for the illustration came from an advertisement that was in the public domain, according to the complaint.

The illustration appeared on the album cover without a copyright notice and no one sought to copyright it, according to the complaint. That put the design in the public domain, the group said in the lawsuit.

“The banana design is a significant element of Velvet Underground’s ongoing licensed merchandising activity,” the group said. Use of the design as a trademark by the band “has been exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted for more than 25 years.”

99 notes

Show

  1. tiannatapioca reblogged this from sexxdrugsinsanity
  2. alaqui reblogged this from kenyatta
  3. fucketinabucket reblogged this from s-helovesyou
  4. maarieeel reblogged this from s-helovesyou
  5. christianfyi reblogged this from abelson
  6. dumbsl0res reblogged this from ch0lo
  7. s-helovesyou reblogged this from cloudologist
  8. sexxdrugsinsanity reblogged this from knastytime
  9. knastytime reblogged this from cloudologist
  10. visually-delicious reblogged this from pinchevia
  11. numbpussy reblogged this from pinchevia
  12. pinchevia reblogged this from ch0lo
  13. cloudologist reblogged this from coochie-sneeze
  14. heyniceblog reblogged this from abelson
  15. paisajeinolvidable reblogged this from abelson
  16. thereasonablyabsurdanswer reblogged this from abelson
  17. lovemaker-soulshaker reblogged this from abelson
  18. wintertigress reblogged this from nolanalinda
  19. nolanalinda reblogged this from ricketywagonofdreams
  20. ricketywagonofdreams reblogged this from abelson
  21. thealmightyleghorse reblogged this from abelson
  22. coochie-sneeze reblogged this from abelson
  23. cupcakesandblood reblogged this from peacepanda
  24. deepvelvet reblogged this from cuntbiscuits
  25. intothewildee reblogged this from cuntbiscuits
  26. cuntbiscuits reblogged this from peacepanda
  27. cestlafuckingvie reblogged this from wrecklesssabandon
  28. wrecklesssabandon reblogged this from peacepanda
  29. peacepanda reblogged this from abelson
  30. park3 reblogged this from tedr and added:
    Wow. Either the article mashes all the legal concepts or the complaint does. The image was not properly protected under...
  31. flyonair reblogged this from kenyatta
  32. futureoflistening reblogged this from kenyatta
  33. abelson posted this

Blog comments powered by Disqus