kenyatta:

The Velvet Underground sues the Andy Warhol Foundation for infringing use of the “public domain” banana design that Andy Warhol made for them in 1967.
via abelson:

The Velvet Underground sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, accusing it of infringing the trademark for the banana design on the cover of the rock group’s first album in 1967.
The band’s founders, Lou Reed and John Cale, said that the foundation infringed the design by licensing it to third parties, according to the complaint filed today in federal court in Manhattan.
The band, which was active from about 1965 to 1972, formed an artistic collaboration with Warhol, who designed the banana illustration for “The Velvet Underground and Nico,” which critics have labeled one of the most influential rock recordings of all time, according to the complaint.
The Warhol Foundation claimed it has a copyright interest in the design, according to the lawsuit. The Velvet Underground partnership said in the complaint that the design can’t be copyrighted because it’s in the public domain. The banana image Warhol furnished for the illustration came from an advertisement that was in the public domain, according to the complaint.
The illustration appeared on the album cover without a copyright notice and no one sought to copyright it, according to the complaint. That put the design in the public domain, the group said in the lawsuit.
“The banana design is a significant element of Velvet Underground’s ongoing licensed merchandising activity,” the group said. Use of the design as a trademark by the band “has been exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted for more than 25 years.”

kenyatta:

The Velvet Underground sues the Andy Warhol Foundation for infringing use of the “public domain” banana design that Andy Warhol made for them in 1967.

via abelson:

The Velvet Underground sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, accusing it of infringing the trademark for the banana design on the cover of the rock group’s first album in 1967.

The band’s founders, Lou Reed and John Cale, said that the foundation infringed the design by licensing it to third parties, according to the complaint filed today in federal court in Manhattan.

The band, which was active from about 1965 to 1972, formed an artistic collaboration with Warhol, who designed the banana illustration for “The Velvet Underground and Nico,” which critics have labeled one of the most influential rock recordings of all time, according to the complaint.

The Warhol Foundation claimed it has a copyright interest in the design, according to the lawsuit. The Velvet Underground partnership said in the complaint that the design can’t be copyrighted because it’s in the public domain. The banana image Warhol furnished for the illustration came from an advertisement that was in the public domain, according to the complaint.

The illustration appeared on the album cover without a copyright notice and no one sought to copyright it, according to the complaint. That put the design in the public domain, the group said in the lawsuit.

“The banana design is a significant element of Velvet Underground’s ongoing licensed merchandising activity,” the group said. Use of the design as a trademark by the band “has been exclusive, continuous and uninterrupted for more than 25 years.”

70 notes

Show

  1. alaqui reblogged this from kenyatta
  2. fucketinabucket reblogged this from m-e-r-c-u-r-y-rosie
  3. maarieeel reblogged this from m-e-r-c-u-r-y-rosie
  4. christianfyi reblogged this from abelson
  5. dumbsl0res reblogged this from ch0lo
  6. m-e-r-c-u-r-y-rosie reblogged this from cloudologist
  7. perfectpills reblogged this from knastytime
  8. knastytime reblogged this from cloudologist
  9. visually-delicious reblogged this from pinchevia
  10. numbpussy reblogged this from pinchevia
  11. pinchevia reblogged this from ch0lo
  12. cloudologist reblogged this from coochie-sneeze
  13. heyniceblog reblogged this from abelson
  14. paisajeinolvidable reblogged this from abelson
  15. pennydreadfuls7 reblogged this from abelson
  16. ivegot1969onmymind reblogged this from abelson
  17. whereismytoyboy reblogged this from nolanalinda
  18. nolanalinda reblogged this from ricketywagonofdreams
  19. ricketywagonofdreams reblogged this from abelson
  20. waahthisisbullshit reblogged this from abelson
  21. coochie-sneeze reblogged this from abelson
  22. cupcakesandblood reblogged this from peacepanda
  23. herro-im-autumn reblogged this from bloodythongs
  24. deepvelvet reblogged this from bloodythongs
  25. intothewildee reblogged this from bloodythongs
  26. bloodythongs reblogged this from peacepanda
  27. wrecklesssabandon reblogged this from peacepanda
  28. cestlafuckingvie reblogged this from wrecklesssabandon
  29. peacepanda reblogged this from abelson
  30. park3 reblogged this from tedr and added:
    Wow. Either the article mashes all the legal concepts or the complaint does. The image was not properly protected under...
  31. flyonair reblogged this from kenyatta
  32. futureoflistening reblogged this from kenyatta

Blog comments powered by Disqus